Most teams take a reactive approach to conflict by trying to improve team members’ capabilities to respond to clashes. These approaches often allow frustrations to build up for too long, making it difficult to reset negative impressions.
But what if you tried to immunize colleagues against the negative impact of differences at a very early stage in the team’s existence? The skills needed to facilitate such proactive discussions are far easier to master than those required for conflict resolution.
A simple tool can help structure open conversations around five domains – along with five sets of questions designed to surface key differences that disrupt team functioning. The approach empowers managers to facilitate team discussions before the differences between colleagues have had a chance to trigger strong emotions or animosity.
In our previous brain circuits on the topic of team conflict, we looked at questioning our assumptions about others based on their appearance, behaviors and communication styles.
Today we turn to the penultimate area in this five-part series. It concerns possibly the biggest source of conflict in teams: the different ways in which team members think about the work they are doing.
As one executive with a US apparel company sums it up: “There is often tension between the ready-fire-aim types on our team and the more analytical colleagues.”
Ask your team to respond to these questions:
Remember to ask yourself, too.
Your team members’ cognitive styles will likely differ greatly, particularly with regard to methodical versus intuitive thinking. But once they are aware of the problem, you can move on to thinking collectively about ways to match team needs to mindsets, such as by rotating leadership of projects.
After more than a year of working remotely, people are realizing that the lack of boundaries between work and home can cause burnout. Practicing mindfulness is a great antidote to that....
To be influential in complex organizations, you must be able to navigate stakeholder environments and build alliances in support of your objectives. There are key strategies involved in becoming an expert at...
In this final installment of our four-part series, we look at how changing the office environment can have a postive effect on employee behaviors....
Our research found that effective leaders in environments characterized by significant disruption shared some common characteristics, and labeled them as agile leaders. ...
You have 4 of 5 articles left to read.
and then